It’s a callous perspective, but it’s one that keeps Hearts of Iron IV focused amidst such complexity and variability. This is the essence of what it means to dedicate a nation-everything about its economy, infrastructure, government, and ideology-to the cause of conflict. They are goals, they are potential boons, and they are obstacles.
Germany, England, Ethiopia, and everyone else cease to be collections of people. The challenge of shifting millions of men and their gearacross the world to battle ideas and their followers is all that matters. The stories of individual soldiers-with rare exceptions for skilled combatants-get lost in the spreadsheets.
There are no individuals here, only numbers. So if Germany doesn’t present the same existential danger, why shack up with the Allies at all?Īs was the case in the actual mid-20th century, Hearts of Iron IV pulls the perspective on war all the way out. And that comes down to a fundamental difference in ideology-England and its capitalist friends fundamentally disagreed with the Soviets on everything except that Hitler had to be stopped. In the real world, the Alliance between Western and Eastern Europe against Hitler was the most tenuous of friendships, as evidenced by the Cold War just a bit later. The AI responds based on your threat, and who they’re working with. This is the butterfly effect made manifest, but there’s a catch: you’re not the only one making choices. Hold a garrison in one place, and you could cause the world to tremble down the line. Each move, every military press, has ripple effects that cascade outward for years. This isn’t just an alternative perspective on history- it gives you the agency and tools to influence one of the world's most turbulent eras in any way you’d like. In so doing, they managed to reverse the results of the Spanish Civil War, push heavily into the Pacific and ultimately got into a tussle with the UK and myself. Joseph Stalin started a smattering of other wars across the globe, making and breaking alliances to keep global pressure up on Germany. France collapsed under the pressure, but the USSR made some stunning choices. With Italy pulling resources from Africa, it managed to shore up the largest army in the world, which the emerging Mediterranean superpower used to bolster Hitler’s advance into France and Russia. I hadn’t given much thought to the development of the world’s stage or the early theatres of war and as a result, some things got a little out of hand. But, in so doing, Italy went largely unopposed in its campaign in Africa.
With careful choices-namely an eye for research, and carefully hiring top scientists like Robert Oppenheimer (a noted historical nuclear physicist), I pulled it off. I set my sights on having a stable of city-busting bombs ready to go by 1942-three years before their real-world deployment. I started as the United States in 1936, and I decided that I wanted to doggedly pursue nuclear weapons.
It’s easy to muck with the flow of history, and in doing so unearth brain-bending strategic challenges that allow you to tell your own story of an alternate version of World War II. Different players will have different preferences-you can be as dove or hawkish as you like-and Hearts of Iron will support you. You command one of the world’s many countries (you can play as just about any nation that existed during World War II), and your goal in this grand strategy game is to survive the coming storm. That’s what Hearts of Iron IV is all about. War is tricky business, and when your conflict stretches to the globe’s far-flung corners, it gets that much tougher.
0 kommentar(er)
